![xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10 xbitlabs articles cpu display amd k10](https://img.dxcdn.com/productimages/sku_462631_7.jpg)
« Use Advanced Tools to Troubleshoot Performance Problems in Windows 7ĭUH! News of the Day: Windows 7 Requires AV Scanner To Be "Safe" »ĪMD Phenom II x4 965 Black Edition CPU ReviewĪMD Phenom II 965 X4 Black Edition C3 Processor ReviewĪMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 3.4 GHz 125W Processor ReviewĪMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition CPU ReviewĪMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 3.4 GHz Socket AM3 Processor ReviewĪMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition 3. Having analyzed the specifications of this processor we concluded that this model will remain the fastest Phenom II solution until principally new cores come into play. However, this is almost impossible and the recently announced Phenom II X4 965 processor with 3.4 GHz clock frequency and 140 W maximum TDP (which is extremely high for desktop CPUs) proves it. As we have already shown in our previous reviews, the clock frequencies of contemporary Phenom II processors should be way higher than where they are right now in order for them to compete successfully against Intel Nehalem CPUs. Partially the blame is on not the most progressive Stars (K10) microarchitecture used in AMD products. SD 632: Mid-range octa-core SoC with eight Kryo 260 cpu cores at up to 1.8 GHz, an Adreno 509 GPU, a LPDDR4-2666 memory controller and a X12 LTE (Cat 13/12, 300 / 150 MBit) modem. That is why Phenom II X4 CPUs working at such high speeds yields quite noticeably to Intel processors from the high price range. However, clock frequency is no longer of the same significance as it used to be before. The top Phenom II X4 CPU works at 3.4 GHz frequency and it is even higher than the maximum clock speed of the top desktop Intel processors. I know this is off topic, but i was wondering could you post me some benchies from your Core 2 extreme? I'm thinking of upgrading to one of those but i wana see the speed difference between my D930 4.2 and an 圆800.The introduction of 45 nm manufacturing process allowed AMD to increase the clock speeds of their processors very rapidly. just not as clear and certain as AMD fanboys would have you believe.
XBITLABS ARTICLES CPU DISPLAY AMD K10 DRIVER
To put it all simply, the future doesn't look bright for AMD. AMD Radeon HD 4000 Series products and older are not certified to support Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) 1.2 or higher and therefore, do not have driver support for Windows 10. What happens when they take it to 45nm? Then, one wonders how K8L wil compete against Nehalem - that'll be interesting. Conroe has shown that it can scale very high at 65nm. K8L will probably compete against Wolfdale (The Conroe shrink) and whatever quad core intel has on the maket at that time. Its competitior is (AFAIK) the AMD mobile chip codenamed "Bulldozer." Now, I have no idea when Intel will release a true quad core - it took this long for them to introduce a true dual core. I would be very disappointed if it does not outperform the Core CPUs, because K8L will be about a year after Core.īut then, Intel is set to replace Core by 2008 which would be a year after K8L.įirst, Penryn is a 45nm shrink of Merom. However, I agree with your basic assumption, I think K8L will be better than the Core architecture. So, it will be whole different proposition. Yeah, Kentsfield is 2 Conroes in one package.īut by the time K8L is out, or even paper-launched, its competitor will most probably be Penryn, which is a "true" quad core. for helping me in integration of my cache model with his processor model and also for. Click to expand.Kentsfield is a Two-Conroes-Glued-Togeather CPU and if as predicted, AMD's quad cores are K8L they're also true quad cores and get more advantages.